The Correct Opinion

Took a while for people to listen to Jesus too.

Recent Posts

  • Quiz
  • Religion - Part 2
  • The Royle Family
  • The Royal Family
  • The Family
  • Gangs of New York
  • Peter Cook
  • The Greatest Ever Pop Star - Scott Walker
  • Cinema Etiquette
  • Religion - Part 1

Categories

  • Books
  • Comedy
  • Film
  • Life
  • Music
  • Politics
  • Religion
  • Sports
  • Television

Reading

  • Homer: The Iliad of Homer

    Homer: The Iliad of Homer

  • Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil

    Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil

  • Marcel Proust: In Search of Lost Time Volume 4 : Sodom And Gomorrah

    Marcel Proust: In Search of Lost Time Volume 4 : Sodom And Gomorrah

Playlist

  • The Smiths: Meat Is Murder

    The Smiths: Meat Is Murder

  • Bruce Springsteen: Greetings From Asbury Park, N.J.

    Bruce Springsteen: Greetings From Asbury Park, N.J.

  • Outkast: Speakerboxxx/ The Love Below

    Outkast: Speakerboxxx/ The Love Below

  • Jacqueline du Pré: Dvorák - Cello Concerto, Haydn - Concerto in C / Barenboim

    Jacqueline du Pré: Dvorák - Cello Concerto, Haydn - Concerto in C / Barenboim

  • Steve Earle: Guitar Town

    Steve Earle: Guitar Town

  • The Rolling Stones: Some Girls

    The Rolling Stones: Some Girls

  • Neil Young: Tonight's the Night

    Neil Young: Tonight's the Night

  • Van Morrison: Astral Weeks

    Van Morrison: Astral Weeks

  • The Slits: Cut

    The Slits: Cut

  • Scott Walker: Scott 3

    Scott Walker: Scott 3

About

The Family


The most subversive institution in society and the bane of tyrannical despots everywhere.

May 10, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (13)

Cinema Etiquette

No need to tell everyone your incredible analysis of a film as the credits start to roll. No need to ask me what I thought of it, *straight away*. Have you no shame? Will you really pontificate in front of all these people? (Shut it! You came here, I'm not shouting this through a megaphone...) The same goes for concerts, theatre etc: experience it, don't sit through it planning some opinion you'll season with stolen lines from newspaper reviews.

May 06, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (3)

Drugs - Part 2

I know this has been gone over ad nauseum elsewhere, but just getting it down for the record...

None of my business what you do with your own body. I don't think you should take heroin, but it's your choice - the state shouldn't stop you. Crimes committed to fund addiction? The price paid for personal freedom. Punish the crimes, offer help to addicts, increase public awareness of risks. That's it.

May 05, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (3)

Drugs - Part 1


Really boring.

May 05, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (8)

Matthew Pritchard – A hero for our time

I’m not happy with my writing here, but it’ll do for now. The substance will remain the same, the words may change.


I was about to write, “It would be easy to over-intellectualise Dirty Sanchez,” but of course it isn’t – intellectualising it at all takes a leap of faith, this is the most mindless programme ever made. It is also one of the best five things I have ever seen.

Unlike Jackass, you feel that the cameras make little difference to whether or not they do their stunts. Their shenanigans are a way of escaping the boredom of small town post-industrial Wales – putting your scrotum in front of a pool table pocket is a way of pricking the ennui, it’s not about impressing chicks. But enough of that, I’m not making a case for the programme, it speaks for itself, I am stating loudly and clearly that these four men deserve our respect and admiration. They are true heroes and should be celebrated as such. Taking the principle of “no permanent damage” as far as they can, they live life at a heightened pitch compared to the rest of us. They are an inspiration to throw off the shackles of our humdrum lives and search out intense experiences wherever we may find them. Personally I’d rather not jump over barbed-wire hurdles, but that’s because I’m lame. I realise that they are better than me. And the best is obviously Pritchard. He’s like Jesus.

Don’t get me wrong, I can talk about how it’s transcendent and inspirational, but it’s mainly five Welsh blokes hitting each other over the head with skateboards and laughing. And there’s very little wrong with that.

April 29, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (5)

"Yeah, it has a 5kg loading capacity, a spin speed of 1400..."

The specifications of a new mobile phone is an unacceptable conversation topic. The same goes for cars, computers, televisions, stereos and any other piece of electrical equipment. If asked then one may talk about any of these, but your response should be brief and to the point, especially if there are others present.

Bonus: conversations about salaries, pensions and employment entitlements are also wholly inappropriate.

April 21, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (0)

Ditch the jokes, keep the funnies

Telling a joke demands that whoever you are talking to you becomes an audience. Conversation is turned into performance. Anyone can learn a joke, although few may be able to tell it with skill, but funnies come from wit, invention and intelligence. Like, "Would you like to see my etchings?", "Hey, I've got a joke for you..." turns my blood to ice. You have to sit listening with a strange anticipatory half-smile, wondering how shameless you'll be with the fake laughter when the punchline eventually comes. One-liners are about OK, and jokes of the question/answer type at least have brevity on their side. There are only about ten good ones though, and everyone's heard them. Perhaps the only occaison when you can use an actual joke is during a speech - the large number of people lessening the pressure each individual listener has to bear.

You'd better make it a good one though.

April 20, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (0)

Not knowing anything is not the same as being stupid

don’t think I’ll be able to write this without putting in the Socrates quote, "the only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." Right, now that's out of the way I can get on with it.

You don’t need to have an opinion on everything. It’s OK to hold your hands up and admit that you’re confused. I take no particular stance on tuition fees or the Iraq war (other than a vague "I hope it all works out for the Iraqi people as soon as possible") because I think it’s impossible for me to come to a reasoned conclusion. It makes no difference what I think about it anyway, these things will or will not happen without me, and besides, I would be making a decision on incomplete evidence. The world is an extraordinarily complex place, we can only ever have limited information, and so I can resolve very few issues to my own satisfaction. New factors appear, personalities change, the Earth revolves. Leaving room for doubt at least allows you to modify your thoughts over time.

To paraphrase Kierkegaard or Dick Van Patten - if you label yourself, you negate yourself. Belonging to a political party, subscribing to a particular ideology or even thinking of yourself as "left" or "right" takes away a lot of difficult decisions as there is usually a line to follow. I see little reason why desiring public ownership of the means of production should make one anti-fox hunting, or pro-relaxation of current drug legislation. I’m only writing about the Left as I’m closer to it, but there is a checklist. Anything the Sun says? Wrong. Anything Chomsky says? Right. Anything that comes out of the behaviour of the current US administration? Bad. You get the picture. The problem comes with choosing the label and then working back to find out how you feel about various issues. Cop out.

This is certainly not a case for a "common sense" approach - that is just another way of describing opinions formed in ignorance. It is more that one should be aware of the various arguments and intellectual approaches and engage with all of them. One need not come from a "positive" position, "this is what I believe", but instead you should look carefully at what people say, especially those from whichever camp you feel you belong to, to see if it survives scrutiny. Consistency is overrated, the world cannot be easily reduced to simple, all-encompassing models (coming soon: the absurdly ambitious post, "Why Economics is Wrong"). Don’t follow leaders and watch your parking meters, I guess.

April 20, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (0)

Oh, I kept the first for another day! Yet knowing how way leads on to way, I doubted if I should ever come back.

Taste is largely dictated by how you would like to see yourself, not about what appeals to you. Self-knowledge comes not from questioning the opinions of others, but by looking at those things you yourself hold most dear. Do they stand up to scrutiny? Does Frank Sinatra’s singing move me, or did I decide to be the sort of person, a hep urban sophisti-cat, who would like Sinatra? Did I make the choice at some point to be a young crooner fan or was the quality of the work immediately obvious? Similarly, did considerations of not wanting to be racist lead me to give rap chance after chance? Do I actually like Public Enemy or am I just unwilling to reject it? More precisely, did I want to be the sort of person who would have a taste in music which ranged from Cole Porter to the Wu-Tang Clan? If I had stuck to British ‘60s influenced guitar bands would my taste be more pure? More genuine? My dilettantism has certainly led me down roads less travelled, and there have undoubtedly been marvellous discoveries along the way, but how many CDs have I bought, how many books have I read, how many films have I (pretended to) like just because I didn’t want to be seen (and more importantly, I didn’t want to see myself) as the kind of person who wouldn’t like them? Do I really need four Roxy Music albums? The first two would have been enough. I must have ten Dylan albums, and keep buying more, although I rarely listen to more than two or three of them. Do I actually like football or was I trying to fit into some model of what men like? Or did I just want to be able to relate to the cool kids? It may even be more affected, did my academic background lead me into this non-intellectual pursuit? Did I just want to be the kind of person who would read nineteenth century French Literature and then watch Tottenham Hotspur versus Middlesborough, a match I have absolutely no vested interest in, on a Sunday afternoon?

I have no answer to many of these questions, but it is important to ask them. Always be suspicious of everyone’s taste, especially your own. There is no particular reason why someone who likes the Pixies should necessarily be drawn to Gram Parsons, but these things come together in the great opinions fire sale. Of course it may be that certain things are just objectively “good”, and by recognising the quality in one artist you are more likely to be able to appreciate another. So many tastes seem to come together though - Franz Ferdinand, Tate Modern, asymmetrical haircuts, N*E*R*D, unusual “ethnic” food, modern dance, Charles Bukowski, No Logo (of course many of these things *are* logos) Donnie Darko (I hold my hands up, I like at least some of these, I'm just picking some things that tend to go together. I could just as easily have said The Sandman, Sisters of Mercy, Baudelaire and photophobia) - and it is this bunching that makes me suspect many buy a job lot rather than work things out individually. How many Tate Modernists would say that they supported Michael Howard? Some young people do though, it seems strange that there is less of an overlap. (NB idea for T-shirt to wear in Shoreditch, “I hate Sushi”.) Similarly, I see no reason why there should be a statistical correlation between liking the Rapture and taking a pro-Euro stance. I have an economics degree, but I still don’t know if it’s a good thing or not, it’s an extremely complicated issue. However, it’s obvious that a lot of people have put themselves in the “yes” camp because they think it stands for open-mindedness and against xenophobia. It’s OK though, you can be undecided. You may never decide - who can have an informed opinion on everything? (More of this to come in future postings.)

To return to my original point, perhaps it’s not simply a matter of affectation. Maybe it is just best to search outside what would normally be seen to appeal to your demographic to see what truly resonates. Fight The Man and his obsession with putting us all in boxes. If you love Jane Austen then say it loud and proud. And stop pretending you like the Naked Lunch. It’s rubbish.

April 20, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (0)

Universities should ignore all A-Levels except General Studies

"General Studies is a joke, we had loads of crappy lessons about books and rivers and that. Pointless." No. You're wrong. General Studies is the best indicator of ability (depending on exam board). It's strengths are precisely those characteristics which are often most criticised.

1) You can't revise for it. - It doesn't test short term memory and so doesn't favour cramming.
2) It's not fair, there's too much maths. I do arts. - Yeah. Then you don't have a good general education. Your abilities are limited.
3) There's loads of useless stuff you have to learn. I don't care about books/rivers/cities. - Well, you fucking should. Bad luck, you're penalised for being a moron.

And yes, I did get an A. I got an A in everything else though, I have no particular axe needing grinding. (Note to self: idea for future post on A levels being a more accurate measure of ability than degree results.)

April 20, 2004 in Life | Permalink | Comments (0)

Next »
My Photo

Recent Comments

  • PamLFemaleQ on Why Does Our Joyless President Never Dance?
  • Tasha on Fox Hunting
  • joe on Fox Hunting
  • f u on Fox Hunting
  • belle on Fox Hunting
  • lauren on Fox Hunting
  • Ema on Matthew Pritchard – A hero for our time
  • Kathy on The Greatest Ever Pop Star - Scott Walker
  • obsessionwidslim on Eminem
  • Sportin' Life on "I'd like to see Ben Affleck do *that*!" or You make me feel like dancing.

Archives

  • May 2004
  • April 2004

Reading List

  • Norman Mailer: The Executioner's Song

    Norman Mailer: The Executioner's Song

  • Ovid (Ted Hughes): Tales from Ovid

    Ovid (Ted Hughes): Tales from Ovid

  • Mark Twain: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer

    Mark Twain: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer

  • David Winner: Brilliant Orange: The Neurotic Genius of Dutch Football

    David Winner: Brilliant Orange: The Neurotic Genius of Dutch Football

  • Martin Amis: The War Against Cliche: Essays and Reviews, 1971-2000

    Martin Amis: The War Against Cliche: Essays and Reviews, 1971-2000

  • Craig Hansen Werner: A Change Is Gonna Come: Music, Race & the Soul of America

    Craig Hansen Werner: A Change Is Gonna Come: Music, Race & the Soul of America

  • David Thomson: Biographical Dictionary of Film

    David Thomson: Biographical Dictionary of Film

Reciprocal Links

  • daniel's corner
  • Jah Jah Dub
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Add me to your TypePad People list
Blog powered by TypePad